For the SPICE simulation code, see “Source Code” section below.
Operating Point Analysis
Here, we are calculating the DC voltages (bias voltages) at every node of our circuit.
Results: Node DC measurements (re-formatted for display).
Node Measurements ---- ------------ n1 .6657 V n2 1.0 V n3 1.3318 V n4 .6663 V n_pos 5.0 V v1#branch -50.0 uA v2#branch -49.9800 uA (v2#branch/v1#branch) .9996
In our DC analysis, we are measuring the variation of the mirrored output current under different loads.
We are applying a DC sweep to V2 (our load voltage) from 0 to 5V in 0.1V increments.
We are plotting the output current magnitude vs collector voltage. (our load voltage at n2)
Monte Carlo Analysis
Given that we now have more devices for our current mirror, the reference book emphasizes the importance of a Monte Carlo simulation to measure the effect of transistors’ mismatch on the performance of our current mirror i.e. how small variations in individual transistors when added together can affect the performance of the overall circuit.
Performing a Monte Carlo (mismatch) simulation on NGSPICE turned out to be difficult but possible with some effort.
The Monte Carlo Testbench SPICE source code provided below has been thoroughly commented to ease understanding. I have also added helpful references at the bottom of this post, and a “montecarlo_examples” directory in the lab files repository.
The main thing to keep in mind in simulating device mismatches is that the transistor model with its respective parameters needs to be placed inside a SPICE subcircuit. This is the only way to be able to modify parameters independently for every transistor in the netlist, otherwise a change in model parameters propagates to all transistors.
The Monte Carlo simulation was performed for 100 runs with a sigma value of 3.
As per the book reference (in the simulation chapter) for bipolar transistors: independent variations of Is, Bf and the junction capacitances were simulated for each transistor.
As mentioned before for the Wilson Current Mirror lab report, there was a matching error for transistors Q1 and Q2: their collector voltages were not the same.
Thus a fourth transistor (Q4) was added, its main job to decrease the voltage at n3 by one V_be in order to bring the voltages n4 and n1 (the collector voltages for the current matching transistors Q1 and Q2) more closely in line.
The results as we can see from our Operating Point Analysis (v2#branch/v1#branch) is that we now have a 99.96% current match given a 1V load which is quite remarkable.
But indeed as mentioned in the reference book, variations due to transistors mismatch can account for as much as +2% to -5.6% (from our montecarlo simulation) relative to our reference current value.
_This error is larger than that of the book, unfortunately we don’t have the exact values used for the Montecarlo (mismatch) simulation in the book, nor the actual SPICE device parameters modified for every transistor during the simulation (this makes it almost impossible to compare results). However we will keep this report updated if any error is found.
For the “Four Transistor” current mirror in the reference textbook, the following are the error measurements:
Variation of 49.9797uA to 50.0468uA over an operating range of 1V to 5V.
This is equivalent to an error of 0.1342% relative to the current reference.
The minimum voltage of the load (the voltage compliance) is given by the need to maintain a V_be voltage for Q2 plus a (collector to emitter) saturation voltage for Q3 (see figures of merit below).
Figures of Merit
Output Resistance: 59.61MR (from 1 to 5V linear range)
Compliance Voltage: 1V (from ground)
- Textbook (Hans Camenzind)
- Chapter 3 (page 3-5)
- Previous report
- Lab 3.6: Current Mirrors – PNP Wilson Current Mirror
- Next report
- Lab 3.8: Current Mirrors – Scaling Currents (Ratios)
Find a problem? Mistakes? File an Issue. You can reply on an existent thread related to this post, or otherwise create a new issue using the title of this post.
Comments? Drop me a note at the address below.